One of our requests at last night's meeting was for TDOT to put up a project website with comprehensive info about the project.

Yvette Martinez, TDOT Region 1 Community Relations Officer, said at the meeting that she would look in to it.

We have just been advised by Ms. Martinez the request went to TDOT headquarters in Nashville first thing this morning and TDOT web personnel are already working on it. She said she would keep us posted on when the site will go live.

She also forwarded our follow-up suggestions for what information should be included on the site.

Thanks to Ms. Martinez for being so responsive.

Here's a summary, we'll have a more detailed report in the next day or so.

Turnout was good. We estimate 60-75 citizens, plus several TDOT and local government officials.

The purpose of the meeting was an overview presentation of the project, the benefits, the current status, and discussion of the draft Environmental Assessment report. Copies were available for review (it is 150-200 pages). There were also maps of the preferred route.

According to TDOT officials, the EA is the same one presented in 2004 with no substantive changes. The project is still in the environmental phase. Read more about that process here.

TDOT wanted public comments restricted to a mail-in form or verbally to the court reporter on hand. There was a Q&A session following the presentation that lasted a little over an hour. Several people commented anyway, or made their opinion known in the form of questions.

The public participants appeared overwhelmingly opposed to the project.

One businessman spoke in support of the bypass and complained about all the negative comments and questions. He put out an altar call for local officials to come up and talk about the positive aspects of the proposal. Alcoa Mayor Don Mull spoke in favor of the project, along with a chamber of commerce representative and a Knoxville Regional TPO official.

TDOT officials were shockingly unprepared with details and answers. Several people commented on this after the meeting. One person said they felt they were being left in the dark on decisions that have already been made without any public participation.

We talked to a couple of Alcoa officials afterward who were much more forthcoming with facts and figures about why the city believes this is the best solution. TDOT should have let them run the meeting. It would have been far more informative and productive.

Anyway, the public came out and they were heard loud and clear. Local media came out to cover it, too. A Maryville Daily Times reporter was there, along with WATE and WVLT. There may have been other reporters.

We'll have more in a day or so, so check back.

WATE had a report about the project on the 5:30 news. They talked with TDOT and city officials and one local businessman about the benefits, and mentioned the opposition at stopalcoaparkway.com.

We are glad the project is getting some media coverage pending tomorrow's hearing. All affected residents should attend to learn more about what is being proposed and how it will affect the community.

A couple of notes. WATE reports the daily traffic count as 60,000 as opposed to 75,000 reported in the local paper quoting a city official last week. (TDOT says it's in the 50,000 to 55,000 range.)

WATE reports the number of fatalities as six compared to nine as reported by the local paper quoting a city official last week. (Our search of news archives only found two in the project area, but one is one too many.)

The cost has gone up from $64 million to as much as $80 million according to the WATE report. WATE also reported that there is no design but there is money in the budget for right-of-way acquisition.

The Maryville Daily Times incorrectly reports that "A public hearing on the environmental impact statement was held June 29, 2004."

To my knowledge, there has been no Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this project. The meeting in 2004 was for public comment on the draft Environmental Assessment (EA).

We are not civil engineers, planners, traffic or highway experts, so we're not qualified to say what exactly should be done.

But, at the 2004 environmental study hearing there were several build proposals put forward. If I recall correctly, three of them were variations on the Parkway/bypass idea with varying routes that impacted more or fewer property owners, required more or less right-of-way, etc.

There was at least one proposal to redesign the existing highway that was significantly less costly. And of course there was a "no-build" option, which I don't think anyone believes is an option at this point.

Unfortunately, we have so far been unable to obtain any documents about any of the other options, but we are tracking down a lead from another TDOT official and if we find them we will post them.

Regardless, anyone who regularly travels Alcoa Highway must surely have some ideas, some more feasible than others.

First off, the purpose of this website is to be constructive, not confrontational.

We understand that community leaders and local government officials believe this project is in the best interests of the community. They aren't bad people. They have serious responsibilities and take them seriously. They are doing difficult work with limited resources and doing an outstanding job for the most part, and they are frequently under-appreciated.

We just disagree a little on the approach to this project. We do, however, agree that something needs to be done about the problems along Alcoa Highway to improve safety and address capacity issues. We also believe sustainability, environmental, and community concerns should be taken into account and at least be given a fair hearing.

Some might argue that we're late to the party on this project, which has been in the planning stages for more than a decade. Mea culpa. We try to stay informed. We subscribe to two daily papers. We only learned about the upcoming TDOT meeting because it was buried mentioned briefly at the bottom of an article about local economic development.

And as bloggers, we stay pretty tuned in to the news and goings on. But somehow we missed that a preferred build alternative had been selected and that right-of-way acquisition was about to begin. To our knowledge, there has only been one public meeting about this project, and that was in 2004 concerning the environmental study. (This was confirmed by a TDOT official.) We were at that meeting, and heard the community's frustration and concerns.

Perhaps there were other meetings, announcements, notices, news, etc. along the way to keep the public informed and we just missed it. As average citizens we can't be everywhere all the time. We suspect other residents of the community are in the same boat. It could also be a reflection of local government, which does such a good job in Alcoa that folks just leave them alone to do it and assume they will do the right thing.

Anyway, in looking for more documents about the project we have been unable to locate any records of the public comments received by TDOT at the 2004 public hearing. We will follow up with TDOT and try to obtain the records, if they exist.

I did recall, however, reporting on the meeting at a previous blog that I operated, which was in fact a little more confrontational than constructive. At any rate, it's a pretty good summary of the meeting, and expresses some of the public's frustration with projects like his one and the Pellissippi Parkway extension.

From the archives of the blogger formerly known as South Knox Bubba...

The Maryville Daily Times has an article in today's paper about the proposed Alcoa Parkway bypass that discusses the pros and cons of the project and our stopalcoaparkway.com website launch.

NOTE: I am misquoted in the article, apparently due to confusion about an Oct. 25 post on BlountViews regarding the upcoming public meeting. The blog post, which is quoted extensively in the paper, was authored by 'bizgrrl', not me as stated in the article. The Mrs. and I disagree a little on traffic lights and the ultimate cost of fixing that stretch of highway, but we do agree that a bypass might not be the best alternative.

And M. Neal (the author of the blog post in question and the organizer behind stopalcoaparkway.com) makes a good point. TDOT presented several alternative solutions ranging in cost from $1 million to $64 million. Surely there is a solution in between that will cost less and have less negative impact on the environment and the community.

Anyway, thanks to the Maryville Daily Times for keeping the public informed about the proposed Alcoa Parkway bypass and for covering opposing points of view.

UPDATE: The Maryville Daily Times has made corrections to the online version of the article.

From the Tuesday Nov. 9 meeting announcement:

"TDOT will also have representatives available to answer questions on the relocation assistance program, right-of-way acquisition, and construction."

We know there will always be some right-of-way acquisition, but who's getting relocated? Are they going to relocate a golf course? Where? Are there homes in Springbrook near the Hunt Rd. interchange that will be affected?

Anyone along the path of the "parkway" should come to the meeting and ask these and other questions.

We can't find much information about the Alcoa Parkway (bypass) project on the TDOT or Knox TPO websites, but we have posted under "Resources" (over on the right) what we have accumulated so far. If you have links to any other documents, maps, etc. please let us know.

Note: The proposed route map was provided by the City of Alcoa several years ago. It is our understanding that there are two or possibly three proposed routes, plus the no-build option. We aren't sure which option this is, but it gives a general idea of what's being proposed. We scanned the map and added notation to help orient you to where this is happening.

In the planning documents, meeting minutes, etc., you will have to search for "Alcoa" to find specific references to the project. It appears to be broken down into several phases, and we are unable to find a single, comprehensive document about the plan.

We have also included a printable flyer regarding the upcoming public hearing. Please feel free to print out copies for friends, neighbors and anyone else who might be impacted and/or should attend the meeting.

We have also included a copy of an ad that will appear in the Friday, Sunday and Monday Maryville Daily Times.

The Maryville Daily Times has a front page, top of the fold headline article about the Alcoa Parkway project.

The way it's written, one would get the idea that the project is a done deal. It uses phrases such as "will have." "will run," "will be," and "once the road is built."

Apparently the latest public hearing is just a formality. The last one was held in 2004. Has there been an environmental impact study, or did someone ordain that it wasn't needed?

The Chamber of Commerce and local government officials never met a road project they didn't like, and the Maryville Daily Times has their back. That's OK. They all believe it's in the best interest of the community, and we all agree there's a big problem with Alcoa highway. Some of us just think there may be better ways to fix it that aren't being considered.

If you think TDOT and Alcoa should consider other, lower impact alternatives then be sure to come out to the TDOT meeting next Tuesday, Nov. 9th.